Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[Download] "Smith v. Freeman" by Reported In the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland ~ eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Smith v. Freeman

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Smith v. Freeman
  • Author : Reported In the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
  • Release Date : January 26, 2002
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 77 KB

Description

Concurring Opinion by Alpert, Paul E., J. (Retired, Specially Assigned) This appeal arises from a request for modification of child support filed by Alyson Victoria Smith, appellant, against Antonio Michael Freeman, appellee. The parties, who were never married to each other, are the parents of five-year-old Gabrielle Marie Smith Freeman. In essence, the dispute centers on the question of an appropriate child support award when: 1) the non-custodial parent is a wealthy professional athlete whose current salary far exceeds the maximum income to which the child support guidelines apply, but whose career expectancy is limited; 2) the parties were never married to each other; and 3) the wealthy father has provided substantial support pursuant to an agreement, in an amount that exceeds the child's day-to-day expenses, but his income has grown substantially since the parties reached that agreement. On October 1, 1998, the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County entered a consent order that resolved issues related to child custody and visitation. Shortly thereafter, the parties reached an agreement concerning child support; among other things, appellee agreed to pay $3500 a month to appellant. At that time, appellee earned an annual salary of about $1.2 million as a football player with the Green Bay Packers. 1 Two years later, when appellee's annual salary soared to $3.2 million, appellant sought an increase in child support. After a hearing in July 2001, the circuit court rejected appellant's position that she is entitled to an increase in child support even though appellee's income has tripled. It concluded that there has been no change in the child's needs, and therefore appellant is not entitled to an increase in child support.


PDF Books Download "Smith v. Freeman" Online ePub Kindle